Carpe Data

Solutions / Minerva Reasoning Engine

The Reasoning Engine for Commercial Underwriting

Turn appetite into auditable, automation-ready decisions over live business data.

Minerva Reasoning Engine decision detail showing a Confident verdict with reasoning trace, evidence chips, and field-level data lineage for an example business

SMB AI So Good, We'll Give You Our Data for Free

Great decisions are made using great data, and we've got the best there is. But great data on its own isn't enough; small commercial carriers need an engine that turns that data into a confident, auditable verdict with more speed and accuracy than their peers.

The Minerva Reasoning Engine is that competitive edge: deterministic, rule-based, and replayable end to end, with every field sourced, every rule named, and without the confidently incorrect noise so common in other AIs.

Inside the Minerva Workbench

Four views of the same workbench: a single legible decision, the appetite authoring studio, the automation-first review queue, and the leadership dashboard.

Decision Detail

Verdict, reasoning trace, evidence

A legible verdict with the reasoning trace, evidence chips, and the data lineage behind every field that mattered.

Transparent, rule-based decisioning over live, resolved business data, fully replayable end to end. Every decision stores each pipeline step, each data pull (source plus fields), and each rule evaluation (the value read, the threshold, whether it fired, and the outcome).

Where a direct signal does not exist, the engine uses an explicit, clearly-labeled proxy and records it as a proxy on the trace, so a reviewer is never misled into reading it as a direct measurement. A multi-source fusion view groups evidence by field and shows where sources agree and where they conflict.

Decision detail screen for a sample business showing a Confident verdict, the reasoning trace by rule, evidence chips, and recommended terms

No False Positives-- Ever

Most AI is built to sound confident, even when it isn't. We took that out of the equation with three clean categories:

Confident

Confident

Clear enough to auto-decide (Write or Decline). This is the number the automation-rate metric tracks, and the work an underwriter never has to touch.

Refer

Refer

Borderline. Routed to a human, with the specific uncertainty named and how to resolve it surfaced on the file.

Insufficient

Insufficient

Not enough evidence to decide. The missing factors are named explicitly, so the underwriter knows what to chase: no confidently incorrect guesses, ever.

How a Submission Becomes a Decision

Every submission flows through a transparent, six-stage pipeline. Each stage is recorded, so the whole decision is replayable end to end.

  1. Stage 01

    Parse

    Reads the submission as it arrives (broker email, loss run, or ACORD-style field block) and extracts the underwriting facts, keeping the raw snippet each value came from.

  2. Stage 02

    Resolve Identity

    Matches the business against the Minerva resolver to confirm who this actually is and pull firmographics. If identity is uncertain, the decision is downgraded to Refer rather than written blind.

  3. Stage 03

    Enrich

    Layers in the resolved firmographic profile and optional public hazard signals, with the source recorded for each field.

  4. Stage 04

    Run Appetite

    Evaluates the carrier's compiled appetite rules against the facts. Missing data never silently fires a rule.

  5. Stage 05

    Score

    Lands the decision in one of three tiers: Confident, Refer, or Insufficient, each calibrated to abstain rather than guess.

  6. Stage 06

    Explain

    Produces the human-readable reasoning trace, the evidence picture, and the field-level lineage that lets a reviewer reconstruct exactly how the verdict was reached.

Five Capabilities at the Heart of the Engine

Appetite Without Code
Receipts on Every Decision
Automation-Ready Queue
Drift Caught Early
Plain-English Answers

How MRE Stacks Up

Seven capabilities a modern underwriting platform actually has to deliver, scored across Minerva Reasoning Engine and the platforms carriers most often compare it to.

How Carpe MRE compares to alternative platforms across seven underwriting-platform capabilities.
Capability
Carpe MRE
AI-native decisioning
Palantir
Foundry / Ontology
Duck Creek
Guidewire Core
BriteCore
Origami / Others
Generic Data
Vendor Feeds
Homegrown
Excel / Scripts
Appetite-as-code, UW-editable
Evidence with provenance
Online signals (CAT, news, web)
Decision audit trail
Time-to-deploy
Insurance-domain fit
Cost / value ratio
StrengthPartialAbsent

Comparison reflects Carpe's market analysis of vendor capabilities as of 2026.

Design-Partner Stage

Taking on a Small Number of Carriers

Minerva Reasoning Engine is in design-partner stage, and Carpe is taking on a small number of carriers to prove the platform against real appetite, real submissions, and real underwriting teams. If your underwriting leadership is ready to write its appetite in plain English and see every decision the engine makes against your own book, we want to talk.